Log in

Root’s Idaho Filing Reveals How It Prices a New Market

Root has completed an Idaho rate-and-rule filing that reveals how the insurer plans to compete in a state where it has no local claims experience: use its existing markets to establish starting prices, select lower benchmarks for collision and comprehensive to build data faster, and let customers purchase coverage before completing a driving assessment.

The Idaho Department of Insurance closed the filing on October 27. Submitted February 11 through Root Property & Casualty Insurance Company, the program provides six-month personal auto policies distributed through direct and embedded channels.

The filing adds detail to Root’s geographic expansion strategy. The company announced its 38th state, Wyoming, on October 21, following New Jersey in July. Idaho’s filing requested a September 30 effective date, but the disposition does not establish a confirmed commercial launch date.

Pricing to build a book—and the data behind it

The clearest business insight appears in Root’s response to questions about its initial base rates.

Without Idaho experience, Root combined Highway Loss Data Institute market relativities with its own pricing and loss indications from other states. It adjusted for differences in territory and rating characteristics, then used premium-weighted comparisons to select Idaho benchmarks.

For bodily injury, property damage, and medical payments, Root targeted approximately the 50th percentile of those comparisons. For collision and comprehensive, it targeted approximately the 30th percentile.

Root explicitly linked the lower physical damage selections partly to lower industry loss trends and partly to its desire to build credible data more quickly for these optional coverages.

That gives the launch a deliberate commercial emphasis: price collision and comprehensive at a lower point within its selected benchmark distribution to help attract business and develop experience. It does not establish that Root will undercut competitors, or that customers will receive a 30% discount.

The distinction matters because a new entrant needs enough policy and claims volume to determine where its initial assumptions work. Root’s approach uses pricing to accelerate that learning, while retaining the ability to adjust rates as the book develops.

Root cited early post-launch rate reductions in Washington and Minnesota as examples of its willingness to revise prices downward. It also told Idaho regulators it would seek revised rates if initial pricing proved inadequate.

Removing the test drive as a purchase barrier

Customers can complete Root’s telematics test drive before buying insurance or bind coverage first and complete it afterward, with pricing adjusted following the assessment. With customer consent, Root can also use previously collected third-party driving data.

The business implication is a shorter path from quote to purchase. A shopper who needs immediate coverage does not have to finish a monitoring period before becoming a customer—an especially useful capability when insurance is offered within another purchase journey.

The underwriting rules also accommodate different levels of data quality. Root identifies three telematics models, selected according to the availability and fidelity of sensor information.

That structure suggests an effort to make behavioral pricing work across a wider range of data conditions, rather than requiring every applicant to arrive with an identical driving-data history.

Paying customers to stay connected

The program extends beyond the initial driving assessment.

A connectivity discount considers enrollment in continuous telematics, the percentage of days for which Root receives driving data, and the time since the last connection. The filed factors provide discounts of up to 5% in the driver-rating calculation, with smaller or no discounts in other combinations.

This creates a financial incentive to maintain the data relationship after purchase. For Root, continued connectivity can support ongoing risk assessment; for customers, it becomes another component of the price they can influence.

The broader rating plan also uses annual mileage, previous Root claims, billing history, and the frequency of policy changes. Root is therefore entering Idaho with a framework for evaluating customers throughout the relationship, as its own experience with them accumulates.

A digital insurer with a broad pricing toolkit

Telematics sits alongside conventional underwriting variables.

Root will use TransUnion’s CreditVision Insurance Score 1.0 and Vehicle History Score 2.1, together with driver characteristics, household structure, territory, vehicle information, and other factors. The vehicle-history rules contemplate surcharges for prior damage or title events affecting future repairability and loss potential.

For competitors, this means Root’s Idaho positioning cannot be assessed solely by comparing safe-driving discounts. Its selection and pricing combine driving behavior with credit, vehicle history, and household information.

The program also includes optional rideshare and delivery coverage and original equipment manufacturer parts coverage. The latter is available for qualifying vehicles up to 10 model years old, with physical damage factors varying by vehicle age. Those options broaden the product’s relevance to gig drivers and customers concerned about repair specifications.

Acquisition incentives come with renewal implications

The filed e-delivery discount reduces applicable coverage premiums by 7%, but the rules limit it to the first policy term.

A separate Current Information Discount rewards customers who complete an approved process to confirm underwriting information. Its factors vary by policy tenure, offering another way to encourage customer engagement while differentiating prices across the relationship.

These features make the initial quote only one part of the competitive picture. The expiration of a first-term discount can affect renewal pricing even when other rating inputs remain unchanged.

Fees shape the actual price proposition

Root’s program includes a $100 operations expense component, calculated once per policy, and a separate $50 policy fee charged at initiation or renewal. Listed fees also include $8 per billed installment, $10 for late payment, and $15 for reinstatement.

The operations component is intended to recover customer support costs. Root’s supporting exhibits present it and the policy fee as explicit mechanisms for recovering expenses.

For shoppers and competing carriers, the relevant comparison is the full cost of coverage—including payment-plan charges and the duration of discounts. The filing shows Root pairing selective launch pricing and a flexible buying process with detailed mechanisms for recovering expenses and repricing risk as customer information develops.

Get ERRRA in your inbox